Author Archives: Laudan

Short e-newsletter: Dec. 09, 2011

Short

 

 

**If you would like to no longer receive my legislative e-mail updates, respond to this e-mail and put the words “remove” in the subject line.  Also, feel free to forward this e-mail to families and friends so they can subscribe to these updates.**

————————————————————————————————-

 

Dear Friends and Neighbors,

The second special session of 2011 began Nov. 28, and is schedule to last 30 days.  The governor announced the special session on Sept. 22.  The $32.4 billion budget passed last May assumed a nearly 14 percent increase in tax collections, which amounted to $3.8 billion.  In this economy, House Republicans warned that assuming such a jump in tax collections and crafting a budget that included money that was yet to materialize was an irresponsible gamble.

Update on special session and state budgetRep. Short

At the end of the first week of the special session, there was absolutely no progress on addressing the $2 billion spending gap in the 2011-13 state operating budget.  The governor’s proposal, including a $500 million tax increase on citizens, is on the table.  However, the majority party in the House and Senate have not signaled wide support for it, nor have they put forward any alternative solutions.  It was made very clear that the Legislature was being called back to address the spending gap in a timely fashion.  The fact that no action has been taken on the budget is discouraging.  Every day the Legislature is in Olympia it costs taxpayers thousands of dollars that could be better spent on education, public safety and taking care of the most vulnerable among us.

I strongly believe in priorities of government when it comes to crafting the budget.  Unfortunately, the governor’s proposal holds kids, the elderly and disabled, and safe communities hostage to new and higher taxes.  Telling citizens that the only way we can pay for education, public safety and care for the vulnerable is through a tax increase is untrue and cruel.  I believe education, public safety and caring for our most vulnerable are core government responsibilities.  So, why is the governor leaving in place programs we can’t afford and increasing budgets for state agencies that are not core services?  Here are some examples of why I do not think the governor’s budget is prioritized to fund core services first:

  • It cuts funding for senior citizen services by 20 percent while cutting the Department of Ecology total budget by only 4.4 percent;
  • It fully funds $11.5 million for state employee step salary increases while cutting $9.2 million from state employment and day services for the developmentally disabled;
  • It continues to fund $476,000 for sick-leave cash payments to state employees while cutting $450,000 from funding for the Family Policy Council that supports at-risk youth and families;
  • It provides $15.3 million to fully fund a recent initiative (I-1163) that everyone, including herself, has said the state cannot afford while cutting eligibility for certain disability and long-term care services by $14.6 million;
  • It maintains 90 percent of funding for the State Energy Policy/Research Office while cutting services for domestic violence legal advocacy and crime victims services by 20 percent; and
  • It cuts $27 million in funding for critical access hospitals (the 7th district has several rural hospitals that will be put at risk) but includes $37 million for health care services for undocumented children.

Gone are the days when budget writers can make everything a priority.  The housing market is no longer providing extraordinary tax collections.  The private sector is sharing in the sacrifice and we believe the public sector workforce, all of the workers not just a select few, should have a hand in solving the spending gap.  House Republicans believe the citizens of Washington should not be asked to pay more in taxes to fund state agencies still giving pay raises to some state employees.  You can see detailed charts on state spending and the budget in our Report to Taxpayers here.

Let’s get Washington working again

WashingtonWorkingLogo I continue to believe we do not need new and higher taxes, we need more taxpayers.  That means getting people back to work and creating a tax and regulatory environment that encourages private-sector job creation.  Not only do we need to craft a sustainable and responsible budget during the special session, we believe adopting common-sense proposals that make employers feel confident enough to hire and expand their operations is equally critical.  We have offered several proposals this year, and in years past, that do not cost taxpayers a dime but start the process of reforming government in ways that make our tax and regulatory scheme less burdensome for employers so they can do what they do best – create jobs.

If we get our work done in a timely manner and forego the 2012 legislative session, we could save more than $2 million.  The governor has said job creation legislation can wait until 2012 but I believe the thousands of Washingtonians who are out of work can’t wait any longer – they want a paycheck, not a government check.

My House Republican colleagues and I are prepared to work toward solutions that put people back to work, reform government and create an environment where everyone can prosper.

Costs related to protests on Capitol Campusphoto (14)

As you have likely read in the papers and seen on the news, the first week was a bit crazy with protestors interrupting hearings, attempting to camp in the rotunda and disruptive behavior.  The “Occupy” groups that converged on Olympia are protesting the governor’s budget that includes spending adjustments to align with
state tax collections, which are projected to be 6.9 percent higher than the 2009-11 budget, or nearly $2 billion more.  Because of the behavior of some of the protestors and the encampment at Heritage Park at Capitol Lake near the dome, there has been extra state patrol and work at the park to address the group.  Here are the costs as of Sunday, Dec. 4:

Washington State Patrol: 

  • $27,000 – Travel, per diem, supplies, etc.;
  • $146,000 in overtime; and
  • $201,000 in straight time (or salaries the troopers would have been paid for their regular work).

Heritage Park (run by the Washington State Department of Enterprise Services or DES):

  • $3,810.93 – Costs for plumbing repairs, some electrical work and other miscellaneous repairs to turf, etc.; and
  • $1,037.40 – Trash collection and park clean-up.

The DES spokesman told us the cost estimate to repair the damage to the new turf at Heritage Park, which was installed two years ago, cannot be determined until the “Occupy” group has left the park.  At this point, the group has refused to pay for a permit to use the park, so taxpayers are footing the bill not only for security at the Capitol Campus, but also to take care of the non-permitted encampment.

It does not escape us that every taxpayer dollar spent on these protests is a dollar that could pay for services for disabled and elderly citizens, school children and protecting our communities.

I’ll continue to send periodic updates throughout the special session and into the regular 2012 legislative session.  Please let me know if there is anything I can do for you.  It is an honor and privilege to serve you in Olympia.

Sincerely,

 

Shelly Short

State Representative, 7th Legislative District

OP-ED by Sen. Morton and Reps. Kretz and Short: Rules governing state’s shorelines need to strike balance with private property owners

In counties throughout the state, local officials are in the process of updating their shoreline master programs. Many citizens in the 7th Legislative District living on or near particular shorelines feel unfairly targeted with new restrictions and obligations on their property.

As elected officials with a history of working on behalf of private property rights, we’d like to bring a little background and clarity to the issue, while providing folks a strategy for having their voices and opinions heard.

Back in 1971, the Washington Environmental Council used the initiative to the Legislature process to put a shorelines protection bill before the Legislature. However, the Legislature passed a bill that was a bit different than the council’s proposal and both pieces of legislation went before the people in a public vote. The voters chose the Legislature’s version and thus the Shorelines Management Act (SMA) was born.

From the beginning, the act provided that the state would approve whatever local ordinances were proposed to implement the act and authorized the Department of Ecology (DOE) to make guidelines for what should be in the act. The DOE uses its authority to create rules, policy manuals and handbooks, adding hundreds of pages to the existing law. In addition, since the act’s inception, we’ve seen a litany of changes to the SMA through court cases, legislation, and continued rulemaking and policy guidance from DOE. In many cases, the federal and local governments have specific requirements which must also be taken into consideration. This has created a heavy-handed process that is frustrating for landowners, cumbersome for local officials, and discouraging to the general public.

At various times over the last few legislative sessions, we have proposed or supported legislation to benefit property owners caught up in this complicated process. Our goal has been to give local governments and landowners more flexibility. We believe county commissioners can figure out what best fits their communities rather than having to implement regulations that were created with Lake Washington in mind.

In 2010, legislation passed which said that local critical areas ordinances could apply in the shorelines until local jurisdictions updated their programs. The law required that the shoreline master programs provide the same level of protection within the shorelines as the critical areas ordinance, and also required that there be no net loss of ecological functions. We opposed these changes.

In 2011, the Senate introduced legislation that was originally intended to protect legally built structures and designate them as conforming uses. This bill was modified throughout the legislative process so that it only protected homes and their secondary structures, including garages and sheds but not bulkheads or over-water structures. We supported amendments that would let any legally built structure be repaired or rebuilt. We supported the inclusion of protecting businesses, not just residential structures, but those amendments were not adopted. In the end we voted in support of the bill because, while it didn’t go as far as desired, we believed it offered some protection to residential property owners. We will continue to work through the legislative process to try to bring further protections to property owners.

Where do we go from here?

Citizens who find themselves in real life disputes regarding shorelines need to let legislators (us) know so that we can use the examples to justify improvements to the law in the future. The best arguments for legislative change come from real life examples of what is working and what is not.

You can also be involved at the local level. Find out when the commissioners are meeting to discuss the shorelines updates and give your testimony about your experiences. If you know of professionals or scientists that deal with shoreline environmental health, have them look at the policies and publicly comment on whether DOE has the science right. This is especially helpful when local authorities want to implement something different than what is coming from DOE.

While we live in a state that values the health of our shorelines, we must make sure the policies implemented are not driven by West-side environmental activism and that the fundamental rights of property owners are protected. We invite you to be part of the solution by being involved in the process.

-30-

(Sen. Bob Morton, R-Kettle Falls, Rep. Joel Kretz, R-Wauconda, and Rep. Shelly Short, R-Addy, all represent the 7th Legislative District.)

House Education Committee work session to take place in Davenport Oct. 5

Reps. Kretz and Short encourage constituents to attend, share thoughts

The Washington State House of Representatives Education Committee will host a work session and roundtable discussion with legislators and the public on Wednesday, Oct. 5 at 4:30 p.m. in Davenport. Reps. Joel Kretz and Shelly Short encourage citizens to attend the meeting and participate in the discussion. The details of the work session are as follows:

What: House Education Committee work session
Date: Wednesday, Oct. 5
Time: 4:30 p.m.
Where: Davenport High School Auditorium, 801 – 7th Street, Davenport
Who: Lawmakers, education stakeholders and the public

The meeting agenda will include such topics as State Board of Education proposed and current graduation requirements, state testing and school district organization, such as cooperatives and shared services in rural school districts.

“The needs of rural school districts can vary greatly from urban counterparts,” said Kretz, R-Wauconda, and a member of the House Education Committee. “As the Legislature debates education funding, graduation requirements and how to address the unique needs of schools in regions like the Seventh District, public input is critical. These types of meetings always send me away with new ideas, a better understanding of what is needed in our communities and pride in seeing how active and vocal folks are in rural Washington.”

“It’s good to see the Education Committee come to our part of the state and visit with small schools because the issues that define us are different from other parts of the state,” said Short, R-Addy. “This will be a great opportunity to discuss the challenges and wonderful opportunities that make up small and rural school districts in our legislative district and statewide.”

Constituents who are unable to attend the meeting, but would like to offer written comments can send them to Kretz at joel.kretz@leg.wa.gov and Short at shelly.short@leg.wa.gov.

###

For more information, contact Bobbi Cussins, Public Information Officer: (360) 786-7252

Short e-newsletter: June 1, 2011

Short

 

Dear Friends and Neighbors,

After a 105-day session, and an extra 30-day special session, the 2011 Legislature finally wrapped up its work last week.  While I’m happy to be back in the district after a strenuous session, the disappointment at the slow pace and the end result of the legislature’s work lingers.

Budget writers from the majority party in both the House and Senate finally agreed to compromise on the few items of contention that were holding up the final budget compromise.  I voted against the $32.2 billion spending plan for several reasons, including:

House floor with Shelly Short

* It relies on 49 new or increased fees, costing taxpayers about $248 million more in 2011-13;

* It makes deep cuts to education without needed reforms, continuing the deep divide between rural and urban school district;

* It puts public safety at risk.  There will be 2,119 fewer offenders on active community supervision;

* It fails to protect the most vulnerable by reducing Medicaid funding, sharply reducing programs that help our developmentally disabled find work, and harms our long-term care facilities;

* It funds a program that pays people to drive to work together;

* It cancels the sale of the governor’s airplanes; and

* It expands a program that pays the rent for recently released felons.

With an additional $4 billion of revenue expected over the previous biennial budget, I’m very disappointed that once again they failed to prioritize spending.

Workers’ Compensation Reform

Much of what was holding up action on the operating budget was an impasse on discussions over workers’ compensation reform.  The Senate passed a bipartisan measure, Senate Bill 5566, which included a voluntary lump-sum settlement option.  A similar measure, House Bill 2109, was introduced in the House.  Unfortunately, the state labor unions did not like the lump-sum settlement option because they were worried that all the cash would be spent up front and the worker would not have any money left over for later.  Despite the fact that the legislation contained ample protections for workers, union bosses – and government bureaucrats – don’t trust employees to do what’s best for themselves and their families.  House Speaker Frank Chopp, who has allied himself with the unions, would not allow the workers’ compensation bills to advance in the House.  IMG_0168

We needed workers’ compensation reform this year for several important reasons, but primarily this: The state-run system has been both costly and inefficient. The state auditor has said there is a 95 percent chance our system will become insolvent in the next five years.  That means only two options: much higher rate hikes against employers to support a failing system – or comprehensive reform of the system.  At a time when profit margins are so thin and many employers are on the razor’s edge of keeping their doors open, unaffordable double-digit workers’ compensation premium increases well into the future could easily seal their doom.  To keep the system solvent and help businesses keep their doors open, we had to move forward with reforming our state’s workers’ compensation system.

To help reach a compromise, we suggested a method called “structured settlements.”  This is a process that pays out settlements over time so that all the money cannot be used at once.  The conferees negotiating reform legislation agreed this would be the best method.  It broke the logjam that had held up workers’ compensation reform and the budget.  The new legislation, House Bill 2123, authorizes claim resolution structured settlement agreements initially for workers age 55 or older, then age 53 or older beginning in 2015, and age 50 or older beginning in 2016, and establishes minimum and maximum periodic payments.  The bill also creates a “stay at work” program that authorizes employers to receive a wage subsidy and reimbursements for employing an injured worker at light duty or transitional work.  I voted in favor of this legislation and am glad our employers will see some relief from excessive workers’ comp costs.

Debt Limit Legislation

I have been working with a bipartisan group of House members to support “The Debt Reduction Act of 2011.”  Senate Joint Resolution 8215, which passed out of the Senate, would phase down the state’s debt limit from 9 to 7 percent over the next decade.  This would have reduced debt payments by more than $3 billion over 20 years.  Unfortunately, the House majority party leadership did not allow this solution to move forward.

A negotiated compromise emerged last week.  Senate Bill 5181, which I voted for, will result in a smaller capital budget that reverses the state’s trend of  increasing debt.  It will also create a state commission to study and recommend changes to the state’s debt capacity.  Senate Bill 5181 doesn’t go as far as Senate Joint Resolution 8215, but is progress toward better fiscal responsibility.

Regulatory Reform

While many of the bills we proposed in our “Let’s Get Washington Working Again” plan failed to pass the Legislature, one of our proposals passed and was signed into law by the Governor.  House Bill 1150, which I co-sponsored, will give small businesses a seven-day grace period to correct violations before fines are imposed.IMG_1455

Keller Ferry

A much-needed and much-anticipated new ferry will be built to serve the Keller Ferry run and the surrounding communities.  Rep. Joel Kretz and Sen. Bob Morton and I worked to see that the state’s transportation budget included funds to replace one of the state’s oldest and non-Puget Sound ferries.

The decision to fund a new boat was made only after a thorough analysis was done and every other option explored.  We looked at purchasing a used boat and retrofitting it to meet our needs; we looked at completely refurbishing the existing boat.  But in the end, the safest and most cost-effective long-term solution was to build a new boat

The new boat will be in the same “under 100 ton class” as the current boat.  It will be an open deck design large enough to carry 20 cars or two semi trucks.  The transportation budget includes about $12 million while the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation are expected to contribute around $2 million.

My Legislation

My bill requesting that Congress adopt an “Honor and Remember Flag” for fallen United States Armed Forces members passed the Legislature earlier this session.

House Joint Memorial 4004 was part of a nationwide effort to have an “Honor and Remember Flag” displayed as an official flag on military holidays alongside the current United States flag and the Missing in Action/Prisoner of War flag.  The national campaign was started recently by the father of a soldier killed while serving in Iraq and has since spread to several states.  This proposal had good bipartisan support as well as the support of several military families from our district.  Thanks to all who helped this legislation pass.

Governor Chris Gregoire signs SB 5625. 20110510-0010 WASENATE ab Also, one of my bills was amended onto another bill that passed the Legislature and was signed into law by the governor.  My bill, House Bill 1611, allows for due process for child care facilities that have been found in violation of an existing regulation or rule.  Currently, a child care facility can be placed on probation for just about any rule infraction, including a missing parental signature or a notice being in the wrong place.  The language in my bill creates sort of a “time out” in the process and makes the Department of Early Learning work with the facilities to correct the problem before taking the large, onerous step of probation.

This proposal stems from some of the problems that child care facilities in our district were having.  In some cases, it appears that facilities may be unnecessarily targeted by the department.

While my bill didn’t pass, the language of my bill was amended onto Senate Bill 5625 which did pass the Legislature with bipartisan support.

Thank you

I want to thank you for all the encouraging words of support from home this session.  Your phone calls, e-mails and letters mean a lot.  Your input helps guide my decisions while in Olympia.  I’m looking forward to getting back into the district and seeing many of you at our community events throughout the summer.  And please remember, I’m here if you need me.

Sincerely,

 

Rep. Shelly Short

7th Legislative District

State’s transportation budget includes money for new Keller Ferry

A much-needed and much-anticipated new ferry will be built to serve the Keller Ferry run and the surrounding communities.

The state’s transportation budget passed the Legislature just hours before the 2011 regular session adjourned on Friday, April 22.  Seventh Legislative District lawmakers worked diligently with transportation leaders in the House, Rep. Judy Clibborn, R-Mercer Island, and Rep. Mike Armstrong, R-Wenatchee, to see that money was included in the final transportation funding proposal to replace one of the state’s oldest and non-Puget Sound ferries.

“I am absolutely thrilled,” said Rep. Shelly Short, R-Addy.  “The surrounding communities, students, farmers and ranchers depend on this ferry for so many aspects of their daily lives.  With the current boat clearly in need of repair, it was only a matter of time before it was deemed unsafe and permanently retired from service.  With funding for a new boat assured, the Keller Ferry will continue to serve local residents safely and timely for years to come.”

Short worked with the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation two years ago to arrange a tour of the Keller Ferry by members of the state House Transportation Committee, congressional staff and representatives from the governor’s office.  This was at a time when the current boat, the “Martha S.,” had been temporarily suspended from service while repairs were made to a section of the hull that had rusted through.

Short said the efforts made two years ago helped set the stage for successful funding of a new ferry in this year’s transportation budget.

“We had great participation from the Colville tribe, the communities and the Department of Transportation,” Short said.  “The Keller Ferry’s importance to the local communities really began to sink in to committee members at that time and I just think folks started to seriously ask themselves, ‘How can we make this work?’  This shows what we can do when everyone is working together with the same vision toward the same goal.”

Short said the decision to fund a new boat was made only after a thorough analysis was done and every other option explored.

“We looked at purchasing a used boat and retrofitting it to meet our needs; we looked at completely refurbishing the existing boat.  But in the end, the safest and most cost-effective long-term solution was to build a new boat,” Short said.

Rep. Joel Kretz, R-Wauconda, said his conversations with fellow legislators about the needed funding for a new Keller ferry usually included a few blank stares and disbelieving comments.

“The fact is, most folks in Olympia had no clue that Eastern Washington had a ferry system,” Kretz said.  “Many of my colleagues thought we were joking when we started seriously asking for their support.  But once we got out a map and showed them the area surrounding the Keller Ferry, people started realizing the limited options available for school buses, commuters and shoppers.  Educating urban legislators about how critical the Keller Ferry is to our local transportation system was the key to getting them to understand this ferry is the ‘Alaskan Way Viaduct’ for many folks in Ferry and Lincoln counties.”

The new boat will be in the same “under 100 ton class” as the current boat.  It will be an open deck design large enough to carry 20 cars or two semi trucks.  The transportation budget includes about $12 million while the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation are expected to contribute around $2 million.

Sen. Bob Morton, R-Kettle Falls, stressed that funding for a new ferry was only possible because of the massive amount of work done to get everyone onboard early.  He singled out the chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen, D-Camano Island, and thanked her for including the funding in her transportation budget.

“Really, there are too many people to list,” Morton said.  “From agency folks, to Congressional staff; from local community leaders, to tribal leaders.  The new Keller Ferry took a lot of work by a lot of people.  But I do want to especially thank my friend and colleague, Sen. Haugen, for being open throughout the process and for being able to see the needs of communities on the other side of the mountains.  As a resident of Camano Island, she knows how important ferries are to the local communities.  She really stepped up to the plate and deserves a lot of credit for helping us out.”

The new ferry, which has yet to be officially named, is expected to be bid-out sometime this summer and could be ready for service by the spring of 2013.

 

-30-

 

For more information, contact:

Brendon Wold, Senior Information Officer (360) 786-7698 (for Rep. Short)

Bobbi Cussins, Information Officer (360) 786-7252 (for Rep. Kretz)

Penny Drost, Assistant Communications Director (360) 786-7522 (for Sen. Morton)

 

IMG_1457

Kretz, Short say failure to address state budget on time is ‘inexcusable’

Failure of majority Democrats to reach agreement on state budget leads lawmakers into special legislative session

After 103 days and the year-long knowledge of a looming fiscal crisis this session, the governor along with majority Democrats in the House and Senate failed to pass a budget. Now their disagreements on state spending will take the Legislature into a costly special session. Reps. Joel Kretz and Shelly Short expressed their disappointment in the failure of Democrat leadership to do the jobs they were elected to do and issued the following statements:

Deputy Republican Leader Joel Kretz, R-Wauconda:

“To not have finished our work on time is extremely frustrating. We have been aware of the serious budget trouble facing us since the revenue forecast last November, so it is inexcusable to me that we are leaving town without a state budget, only to return next week for a special session. It is as though Democrats didn’t believe they really had to write a budget this year.

“For my part, I believe we should have tackled the budget at the start of session instead of waiting until the final two weeks to work out an agreement. Mostly, I am frustrated for taxpayers who expected a solid and sustainable budget solution within the allotted 105 days. Clearly, one-party rule in the Legislature and governor’s mansion has not worked well for the citizens of Washington.”

Rep. Shelly Short, R-Addy:

“This is beyond frustrating, it’s ridiculous.  It’s like they just gave up. The majority party accepted the idea of a special session weeks ago and because of that, we’ve sat around twiddling our thumbs instead of doing the peoples’ business.

“We’ve passed six bills in three days off the House floor. That should take an hour or two, not three days. The poor leadership coming from the Democrats and the lack of desire to be accountable to the citizens of this state are just astounding.”

The 30-day special will begin on Tuesday, April 26. Each day of a special session can cost taxpayers as much as $16,000.

###

For more information, contact Bobbi Cussins, Public Information Officer: (360) 786-7252